|
Post by chainreaction on Aug 29, 2017 17:17:48 GMT
Who said that Motown/Universal and Sony/ATV Songs is going to refuse to license the music, the songs to them. We don't know. There really is no reason that they would not license the music to the film's producers. Who said they weren't. If you RE-READ my original response, Marv2/HectorI stated the producers would have to have major financial backing to afford the music licensing fees that Sony/ATV Songs would surely charge. R.I.F. Reading Is Fundamental "drops mic" LoveSupreme darling everyone does have the right to be stupid but you are abusing the privilege honeybunch. My mother was right, it's easy to be wise, think of something stupid to say and don't say it cutie pie.
|
|
|
Post by jobeterob on Aug 29, 2017 17:53:43 GMT
Who said that Motown/Universal and Sony/ATV Songs is going to refuse to license the music, the songs to them. We don't know. There really is no reason that they would not license the music to the film's producers. Who said they weren't. If you RE-READ my original response, Marv2/HectorI stated the producers would have to have major financial backing to afford the music licensing fees that Sony/ATV Songs would surely charge. R.I.F. Reading Is Fundamental "drops mic" They would never be able to afford the music. Berry Gordy almost certainly has a veto in the use of any of that music for the life of himself and his children.
|
|
|
Post by peacenharmony on Aug 29, 2017 17:54:49 GMT
Who said they weren't. If you RE-READ my original response, Marv2/HectorI stated the producers would have to have major financial backing to afford the music licensing fees that Sony/ATV Songs would surely charge. R.I.F. Reading Is Fundamental "drops mic" They would never be able to afford the music. Berry Gordy almost certainly has a veto in the use of any of that music for the life of himself and his children. That would be my guess. Anyway there are far more interesting & talented Motowners who would make better movie subjects (Marvin, the Ruffin brothers, Tammi to begin with) who were not primarily backup singers. I think a lot of the 'fans' who are desperate for a Florence Ballard movie really just want to see more made-up scandal about other Motown labelmates.
|
|
flo
Junior Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by flo on Aug 29, 2017 18:13:28 GMT
They would never be able to afford the music. Berry Gordy almost certainly has a veto in the use of any of that music for the life of himself and his children. That would be my guess. Anyway there are far more interesting & talented Motowners who would make better movie subjects (Marvin, the Ruffin brothers, Tammi to begin with) who were not primarily backup singers. I think a lot of the 'fans' who are desperate for a Florence Ballard movie really just want to see more made-up scandal about other Motown labelmates. Miss PeacenHarmony you just revealed what this is all about - the Little Girls of Soulful Detroit do not want this movie made because it would further expose how Miss Diana Ross backstabbed and slept her way to the top.
|
|
|
Post by khansperac on Aug 29, 2017 19:53:06 GMT
Don't know why some are so worried about music rights. Her story can be made just covering the years after she left the group. No Supreme music would be needed. If anything they can use her solo recordings.
|
|
|
Post by ranran on Aug 29, 2017 19:53:51 GMT
So once again Florence's story would be reduced to the darkest of her times? That's part of the problem with her story. She was so much more than the depressed alcoholic former singer that some folks want to reduce her to. Why would anyone want to tell Flo, Diana or Mary's story without the Supremes? That's about as insane as telling the John, Paul, George or Ringo story without the Beatles.
|
|
|
Post by ranran on Aug 29, 2017 19:54:09 GMT
I will say that if there was ever a reason for me to get behind a Flo Ballard movie it would be to piss off the jerks who want so much for Diana to be the only relevant Supreme. I bet some of these folks were bleeding from the ears the night Jennifer Hudson thanked Florence on national television. They want so bad for Flo to be nothing more than a Diana footstool. I wonder why that is?
|
|
|
Post by chainreaction on Aug 29, 2017 20:02:17 GMT
I will say that if there was ever a reason for me to get behind a Flo Ballard movie it would be to piss off the jerks who want so much for Diana to be the only relevant Supreme. I bet some of these folks were bleeding from the ears the night Jennifer Hudson thanked Florence on national television. They want so bad for Flo to be nothing more than a Diana footstool. I wonder why that is? RanRan darling I am done. I am not even going to bother outline your inconsistencies and contradictions, the class should be able to do that.
You are doing something before or while you are posting and you need to stop cutie pie, you are destroying your brain honeybunch.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Aug 29, 2017 20:22:08 GMT
I will say that if there was ever a reason for me to get behind a Flo Ballard movie it would be to piss off the jerks who want so much for Diana to be the only relevant Supreme. I bet some of these folks were bleeding from the ears the night Jennifer Hudson thanked Florence on national television. They want so bad for Flo to be nothing more than a Diana footstool. I wonder why that is? Hold on, I thought you called people who wanted it for that reason sick clowns. Come on man, what is up with you? Are you on drugs? Seriously!
|
|
|
Post by Blackguy69 on Aug 29, 2017 20:51:16 GMT
As you see from the posts above, it's clear who wants it and who doesn't.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Aug 29, 2017 20:56:04 GMT
As you see from the posts above, it's clear who wants it and who doesn't. No it isn't. There is one dipshit who can't make up his mind.
|
|
|
Post by ranran on Aug 29, 2017 22:12:35 GMT
As you see from the posts above, it's clear who wants it and who doesn't. You know it BG. But even some of the ones who want the movie don't really want it for Florence, they want it for the "high drama" they hope it causes. So much negativity. As your president 45 would say, "on all sides".
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Aug 29, 2017 22:15:54 GMT
As you see from the posts above, it's clear who wants it and who doesn't. You know it BG. But even some of the ones who want the movie don't really want it for Florence, they want it for the "high drama" they hope it causes. So much negativity. As your president 45 would say, "on all sides". You just said you would wanted it just to piss people off you idiot! What the fuck is wrong with you. Stop posting and give your mind a break, and lay the drugs alone.
|
|
|
Post by hector on Aug 29, 2017 22:46:02 GMT
You know it BG. But even some of the ones who want the movie don't really want it for Florence, they want it for the "high drama" they hope it causes. So much negativity. As your president 45 would say, "on all sides". You just said you would wanted it just to piss people off you idiot! What the fuck is wrong with you. Stop posting and give your mind a break, and lay the drugs alone. Good one Lou! That guy seems like such a Punk!
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous on Aug 29, 2017 22:58:14 GMT
You just said you would wanted it just to piss people off you idiot! What the fuck is wrong with you. Stop posting and give your mind a break, and lay the drugs alone. Good one Lou! That guy seems like such a Punk! Give people enough rope and they hang themselves. Keep on talking RanRan. When you come down you will regret this day,
|
|